Possession
The law defines possession very broadly based on “knowledge, consent and control”. That is why a person can be charged with possession of illicit drugs or a weapon for simply being in the same place where the item was found.
If you or someone you care about has been charged with Drug Possession, Hundal Law Firm is here to help.
What is Drug Possession?
Under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA), the possession of illegal drugs and other controlled substances is a punishable criminal offence. Drug Possession may result in conviction, imprisonment and significant fines.
To be in possession of a substance, one must have knowledge and control of the substance. The definitions of “knowledge” and “control” have been intricately defined and interpreted through many years of case law. Many cases have been decided on whether an accused is in “possession” of contraband. “Possession” is a complex area of law with which Hundal Law Firm can assist.
Severity of Charges
The severity of the charges will depend on the type and quantity of the substance involved. It will also hinge on the alleged purpose for which the accused was in possession of the substance. Controlled substances are classified under different schedules depending on the applicable legislation.
Schedule I substances can carry significant penalties, while the consequences for other scheduled substances can differ. The applicable penalties depend on the substance, the circumstances, and the specific offence charged.
Why having a Lawyer is Critical
One must bear in mind, however, that being convicted of possessing a controlled substance can have serious consequences. The potential penalties depend on the substance involved, the circumstances of the offence, and the applicable provisions of the law.
Amendments to the CDSA have included mandatory minimum penalties for particular drug offences in certain circumstances. The bottom line is that any drug charge is serious. With that said, Possession for the purpose of Trafficking in a drug is a more significant offence than possession for personal use.
Once charged, many people believe they are in a position to defend themselves, especially if they are accused of a less serious possession offence. Hundal Law Firm urges you to resist the inclination to face these charges alone, no matter how small they may appear.
Seeking the expertise of a skilled defence lawyer can help you understand the allegations against you, assess the evidence, and determine what legal options may be available in your case.
Call us at (416) 888-0592 for a consultation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. Depending on the substance, circumstances of the offence, and applicable law, a drug possession conviction can result in imprisonment and monetary penalties.
- Factual Innocence: If the Crown is unable to prove the essential elements of the particular offence beyond a reasonable doubt, they will have failed to discharge their burden, and the accused will be acquitted.
- Violation of Charter Rights: Under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, individuals are afforded specific rights, including:
- the right against unreasonable search and seizure;
- the right to not be arbitrarily detained;
- the right to be informed promptly of the reasons for arrest;
- the right to retain and instruct counsel without delay; and
- the right to be tried within a reasonable time.
A successful Charter challenge may also result in a stay of proceedings, or evidence from your case being excluded.
- The potential penalties for possession depend on the substance involved, the applicable schedule, the circumstances of the offence, and whether the Crown proceeds by summary conviction or indictment where applicable.
- For a Schedule I Substance, the potential penalties may include:
- If the Crown proceeds by summary conviction:
- For a first offence: a maximum fine of $1,000 and a term of imprisonment not exceeding six months, where applicable.
- For a subsequent offence: a maximum fine of $2,000 or a term of imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both, where applicable.
- If the Crown proceeds by indictment: a maximum punishment of imprisonment as provided by the applicable legislation.
- For a Schedule II Substance:
- If the Crown proceeds by summary conviction:
- For a first offence: a maximum fine of $1,000 or a term of imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both, where applicable.
- For a subsequent offence: a maximum fine of $2,000 or a term of imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both, where applicable.
- If the Crown proceeds by indictment: the applicable maximum punishment depends on the specific substance and offence.
- For a Schedule III Substance:
- If the Crown proceeds by summary conviction:
- For a first offence: a maximum fine of $1,000 or a term of imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both, where applicable.
- For a subsequent offence: a maximum fine of $2,000 or a term of imprisonment not exceeding one year, or both, where applicable.
- If the Crown proceeds by indictment: the applicable maximum punishment depends on the specific substance and offence.
Under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA), the possession of illegal drugs and other controlled substances is a punishable criminal offence. Drug Possession may result in conviction, imprisonment and significant fines.
To be in possession of a substance, one must have knowledge and control of the substance. The definitions of knowledge and control have been intricately defined and interpreted through many years of case law. Many cases have been decided on whether an accused is in possession of contraband. Possession is a complex area of law that requires careful consideration of the facts and evidence.
Amendments to the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act have introduced mandatory minimum penalties for particular drug offences in certain circumstances. Whether a mandatory minimum applies depends on the specific offence and circumstances.
Yes, it is possible for someone to be found guilty of drug possession even if no drugs are physically found on them. In such cases, the prosecution must establish the required elements of possession, including the necessary knowledge and control over the substance. For instance, if drugs are located in a space under the person’s control, such as their home or vehicle, this may be relevant evidence of possession. Evidence such as communications, witness statements, or items linked to drug activity can also be used to support the charge. The court will assess all the evidence presented to determine whether the charge is proven beyond a reasonable doubt.